FAA announces UVAV delay of test sites

Discussion in 'CineStar FAQ - Tips and Tricks' started by Gary Haynes, Nov 26, 2012.

  1. Gary Haynes

    Gary Haynes Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5,211
    Likes Received:
    460
    As reported in AVWEB


    November 21, 2012
    Huerta: UAS Integration Delayed
    [​IMG]Email this article |[​IMG]Print this article
    By Mary Grady, Contributing editor

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Citing concerns over privacy, FAA Administrator Michael Huerta has told members of Congress that the selection of six test sites for unmanned aerial systems will not happen in time to meet the agency's target of the end of this year. In a letter (PDF) to U.S. Rep. Howard McKeon, R-Calif., co-chair of the Unmanned Systems Congressional Caucus, Huerta said FAA staffers have been "working diligently to establish the framework for test-site selection … However, increasing the use of UAS in our airspace also raises privacy issues, and these issues will need to be addressed as unmanned aircraft are safely integrated." Earlier this month, 20 aviation advocacy groups (including AOPA, EAA, NATCA, NBAA, GAMA, and more) jointly sent a letter (PDF) to Huerta, asking him to keep the FAA focused on safety, not privacy issues, in regards to the integration of UAS.



    "The FAA has no statutory standing or technical expertise" in regard to privacy issues, the letter reads. The groups also asked Huerta to "ensure UAS are safely and responsibly integrated into the national airspace in a timely manner." At a meeting of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems in August, Huerta said he was "very optimistic" that the FAA would meet the congressional mandate to integrate most UAVs into the national airspace system by 2015 (2014 for UAVs weighing less than 55 pounds). "Rest assured that the FAA will fulfill its statutory obligations to integrate unmanned aircraft systems," he said. However, a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office released in September noted that although the FAA "has taken steps to meet the requirements set forth in the 2012 Act, it is uncertain when the national airspace system will be prepared to accommodate UAS."
     
  2. Jon Fredericks

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2012
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    8
    Unfortunate, they are already months behind schedule and I would be very surpised to see the small rule come out on time.
     
  3. Andy Johnson-Laird

    Andy Johnson-Laird Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2012
    Messages:
    10,381
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    The FAA's mission statement never mentions privacy, only safety.
    It's therefore somewhat puzzling why they are delaying because of privacy issues isn't it?

    Andy.
     
  4. Nick Kolias

    Nick Kolias Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    24
    I sure hope the <55lbs. category rulings are fair and reasonable.

    nick
     
  5. Jon Fredericks

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2012
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    8
  6. Andy Johnson-Laird

    Andy Johnson-Laird Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2012
    Messages:
    10,381
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    As they should! As they should! ;)
    Seriously, though, considering our relative sizes, I think it is I who agrees with the AUVSI.

    Andy.
     
    Jon F. likes this.

Share This Page