As reported by sUAS News the appropriations bill has this language. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS).—The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 directed the FAA to integrate UAS into the National Airspace System by 2015. However, it is uncertain when the FAA can integrate UAS into the Nation’s airspace and what will be required to achieve the goal. The lack of an overall framework for the new systems may be inhibiting progress on UAS integration. The Committee is concerned that the FAA may not be well positioned to manage effectively the introduction of UAS in the United States, particularly in light of a recent ruling by a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) administrative judge regarding the use of a small UAS for commercial purposes. Given these challenges, the Committee has provided an additional $3,000,000 in the Aviation Safety Activity to expedite the integration of UAS into commercial airspace. UAS budgeting.—The Committee understands that UAS have very different operating characteristics, communications and flight planning system requirements than traditional air traffic operations. However, the resource requirements for integrating UAS into airspace and the corresponding impacts on the FAA’s capital and operating budgets remains unclear. The Committee directs the FAA to develop an integrated budget for UAS in the fiscal year 2016 budget request that clearly identifies research and development needs and the requirements for air traffic control systems and operations. Gary Mortimer from sUAS News headlined his post as It’s official scrap 2015 for UAS integration in the USA See full article here http://www.suasnews.com/2014/05/29330/its-official-scrap-2015-for-uas-integration-in-the-usa/
Meanwhile, the only “legal" document we have to reference in the last 5 years is the Pirker decision. This is colossally frustrating.
"Like" means I appreciate the update not the results..... Trying to make last millenium laws fit in to new tech situations is like ball room dancing...... Start out on the wrong foot and you have to stop and start all over again....
And it only applies to the one case, Huerta v. Pirker. I have been told by administrative law professors Judge Geraghty's opinion is not a general statement of law. It merely says, "FAA, in this one case, because of these reasons, you cannot levy that fine on that man." Andy.