I think the technical argument is that are not regulating what the "drone" does, but allowing the property owner to do something. A fine point, I grant you.... Andy.
Thanks for the update Andy, the new language seems much more reasonable. I think it's good to remind people you don't need a "drone" to be an idiot, just a Jeep Grand Cherokee. http://www.aopa.org/training/articl..._id=130308epilot&WT.mc_sect=tts&cmp=ePlt:Phto